federal trial court paralegal los angeles

Federal Trial Court Paralegal

 

Federal Trial Court Paralegal Duties I Performed While Actually Sitting at the Counsel Table During Trial:

 

Draft Special Jury Instructions, Summaries of Witnesses and PowerPoint for Closing Argument, and Operate the Elmo Overhead Projector. 

 

Recently I gained bankable real world experience while sitting at the counsel table for two United States District Court trials. The first was a police misconduct case in Riverside working for an attorney representing the plaintiff in a police misconduct case. The second was working for a well-known former LA County prosecutor defending in a Medicare fraud case.

In both federal trial courts I operated the court’s multi-media system and Elmo overhead projector, prepared jury instructions, took notes on witness testimony, drafted impeachment questions while listening to the witness, and prepared a PowerPoint presentation for use in counsel’s closing argument.

 

Counsel Should Not Stretch Federal Trial Court Deadlines to the Last Minute

 

In the Medicare fraud case the attorney I was working for did everything at the last minute. In both my of my federal trial court assignments counsel were over reliant upon multi-media presentation of evidence to advocate the case. Multi-media presentations for the jury did not work in either federal trial courts. Using technology on weak evidence does not give the evidence more persuasive power. 

 

Federal Trial Court Blow-Ups

 

In the first trial a blow-up of a Google map was used by the attorney to show how far plaintiff had to walk after the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department made him leave a golf tournament at a country club. The plaintiff was drunk and disorderly and the Sheriffs’ told him he had to leave, and that they would give plaintiff a ride back to his hotel. Plaintiff refused the offer of a ride from the police and walked the 1.8 miles back to his hotel. He then later filed a lawsuit alleging police misconduct. The jury in the federal trial court decided a verdict against plaintiff and in favor of the law enforcement officers.

In the second federal trial court the attorney I was working for retained my federal paralegal services two days before the trial date. The lawyer wanted me to come up with special jury instructions regarding safe harbor for employees of a Medicare durable medical equipment provider (DME). The law says that if a DME keeps detailed records and informs Medicare that a DME provider is paying doctors for referrals then that employee is in a safe harbor and cannot be prosecuted under strict Medicare anti-kickback laws. Our defendant did not keep the detailed records and the US Department of Justice attorneys were able to successfully keep my last minute jury instructions from being submitted to the jury. 

The most valuable paralegal service I provided during trial was to listen to the government witnesses and draft on-the-spot impeachment questions and hand them to the attorneys while they were standing at the podium asking that witness questions.

 

Federal Trial Court Exhibit Presentations

 

Defense counsel also had me prepare a PowerPoint presentation for his closing argument which we submitted the day before trial. The government prosecutors were also able to keep the PowerPoint out of the trial. Good thing we did not use that PowerPoint. Instead I manually placed our exhibits on the federal trial courtroom Elmo overhead projector as the attorney was giving his closing argument. My live courtroom presentation working in tandem with the attorney’s closing argument worked much better than death by PowerPoint.  

The defense attorneys attempt to present a trial theme and story of an entrepreneur who made a mistake and not a criminal act worked better without the PowerPoint. The federal trial court closing argument was compelling without relying on technology. 

The problem in both of my federal trial court assignments was that both of the clients I was working for were the bad actors in the proceedings. The facts and evidence were against them and the juries found in favor of the other side. The moral of the story is that a federal trial court paralegal is only as good as the attorneys and clients that the paralegal works for. The attorneys in both cases should have each brought me into the trial preparation much sooner. There really was no trial preparation. I am a very experienced federal trial court paralegal now and I can really help attorneys and small law firms out in preparing their federal trial court cases. However the lawyer must retain me early on in the case to be effective.  

 

Random Archival Posts

The Criminal Industrial Complex is Our New Social ... The State Creates Crime As An Industry and Now Crime is Our New Social Model   Why did the California State Correctional Officer cross the ro...
Protected: You Need a Criminal Attorney and Not a ... You Do Not Need an Attorney or Even a Paralegal to Fill out Criminal Expungement Forms Because it is So Easy How Long Does it Take a Los Angeles Supe...
Exculpatory Evidence Must be Turned Over to Defend... Exculpatory Evidence   Investigation and Discovery    Exculpatory Evidence Exonerates the Defendant   I woke up this morning...
Protected: Only Attorneys May Read This Informatio... Demand Writer Paralegals Litigation paralegals who draft demand letters for compensatory, special and punitive damages are in demand by law firms. Th...
Criminal Expungement is for Cleaning Up Your Own R... This website is for informational purposes only No legal services provided here Criminal Expungement is Only for Convicted Felons Who Are Seriou...
Protected: Default Judgment Checklist for Attorney... Please Do Not Read This if You Are Not An Attorney   Superior Court Default Judgment is Not For Paralegals, You Need to Be a Good Lawyer ...